(Via SlashFilm)
Here be spoilers
If
you haven’t been living under a rock for the past month and aren’t just
checking Facebook for the first time, (or are totally new to this blog, if so,
welcome) you might be aware that I’m quite a fan of Star Wars. (If you have
been living under a rock, congratulations! And Donald Trump is still surging in
the polls.) As a Star Wars obsessive I really can’t review the film in a
traditional manner. I’m Compromised. I would just be saying “OMFG it be the
Star War! Squeee!” over and over again, like Jack Torrance in The Shining Only happier and without
terrorizing Shelly Duval.
Suffice
to say that the acting was amazing, John Bodega fulfilled his earlier Attack the Block promise, Oscar Isaac is
dashingly charismatic, and Daisy Ridley, if it weren’t for my lack of belief in
divine revelation, she would certainly be one. The story was excellent, the
direction fantastic (JJ even withheld lens flairs!). 5/5. A++.
But
to me what makes a great film is the theme, what is film actually about, what
is it trying to say? Many films are quite good, but don’t have a strong theme,
this separates great movies from good ones. But The Force Awakens has a great theme, and is a great movie. What’s
more, expending on this theme can help answer two common criticisms of the
film, one of which is a fair concern, the other is sexist bullshit. The criticisms
are as follows: Episode VII is at best extremely derivative, and at worst a
somewhat carbon copy of A New Hope,
and that Rey is a “Mary Sue” (a perfect character with no flaws.). The big
theme of The Force Awakens shows
these to be false charges, at least in the field of overarching ideas. Because
if it’s about anything, The Force Awakens
is about letting go of the ghosts of the past, so that one may embrace the
future.
But
first, if you’ll permit me the excursus, one of the greatest joy’s I’ve ever
had with critically analyzing pop culture, is the realization that Star Wars as a franchise holds up. The
things I loved as a kid still make my heart flutter, but there is so much more.
The themes of resistance, redemption, hope, and the belief in one’s destiny are
encoded into the DNA of the series. But there are also things that don’t hold
up, or are actually bad. Leia and Lando are both awesome, but one can’t escape
the fact that there appear to hardly be any women or people of color, (let alone
a women of color). This is especially galling as they are in a galaxy far, far,
away, and thus free from any earthbound societal norms. The Prequels, although
being released over twenty years later, are somehow worse, with offensive
ethnic stereotyping, Nemodians (the Japanese), Watoo (an especially gross anti-Semitic
caricature), and Jar-Jar Binks, whose bizarre space Jamaicanism is by some
demonic wizardry not the most annoying thing about him. The casual disregard of
the personhood of the Sand People run through the entire saga. After Anakin
does a personal Mai Lai against an entire village, Padme can only shrug. (I
blame Lucas’ shitty writing.)
But
one of other the major issues with Star Wars, or at least the first six movies,
is its obsession with the past. More specifically the idea of dynastic succession,
the idea that power runs through the blood. Luke, growing up without his
parents, is obsessed with following in his father’s footsteps, his aunt even
says that he will never be a farmer because he “has too much of his father in
him.” Obi-Wan thinks so to, giving him his father’s lightsaber, telling him
that he must learn the ways force like Anakin. Obi-Wan doesn’t attempt to
someone else who might be better suited, or who (sigh) might have a higher midi-chlorian
count, he trusts that the son can defeat the father. Luke also gets his
piloting skills from Anakin, which helps Luke cemented his name when he blows
up the first death star. In Episode IV the big act from an outside force, the
massacre of his aunt and uncle by a detachment of stormtroopers, removes the
final obstacle from Luke embracing his destiny. Hell, the end of Episode VI
sees Luke appealing to the good still in his father, to the Anakin of the past.
Leia also takes after her mother; both are royalty of a type and quick-witted
diplomats.
The
Rebellion’s proper name is The Alliance to Restore the Republic, trying to take
the galaxy back to where it once had been, even though that government had been
hopelessly corrupt. It is in fact only the Empire that tries to create
something new, Tarkin cheers when the imperial senate is dissolved, “The ashes
of the old order”. (But spare me your “the empire was actually good! Takes,
they’re basically space Nazis.)
But
of all the organizations and people in Star Wars, none are more obsessed with
the past then the Jedi Order. “Guardians of the Old Republic for over a
thousand years” they are basically aristocrats, the fact that Jedi aren’t
supposed to have children, doesn’t mean that their tenants aren’t passed down
from generation, a strict code that plants the seeds for their own destruction.
Episode VII changes this. There are
three new main characters introduced in the film, Kylo Ren, Finn, and Rey, Each
goes through a crisis where they have to reject their past, and embrace the
future in order to emerge stronger. Two out the three are fully successful, and
one is partially so.
First
up is Finn, Finn makes his first break from his past when he deserts from the
First Order, “the only life I have ever known”. Throughout the rest of the film
He grapples with his terror of the First Order, a fear he was conditioned to
feel. (Another place where the film breaks new ground is its treatment of
stormtroopers as actual people, perhaps a topic for another essay.) He finally
faces that fear when he goes back with Han to plant the explosives and faces
off against Kylo Ren. Its no accident that Finn’s two great loves of the film
(platonic or romantic, whatever your interpretation) Poe and Rey both see him
as a new man, the former even gives him a new name! “You looked at me like no
one ever had.”
Next
up his Kylo Ren. It’s interesting, and fits in the theme of episode VII that
the main antagonist is literally royalty, descended as he was from the Alderaan
royal house. Kylo is also the product of one of the greatest force wielding
bloodlines, the Skywalkers. That, and his great force ability would seem to
make him a natural fit to lead the new Knights of Ren. Wrong! His obsession
with his Grandfather (the past) leads to his turn to the dark side and the
destruction of the dreams for a resurgent Jedi Order. Sadly however, Ren’s
rejection of his past doesn’t come with him freeing himself from the ghost of
Darth Vader, but instead with killing his father, and killing who he was, Ben
Solo, in order to get some peace. But Ren is still trapped by the shadows of
his grandfather, and therefore his overcoming of his past is only partial.
All
of this leads to Rey. In one of the television teasers leading up to the film,
Rey says: “I am no one.” While that sequence didn’t make it into the final cut,
it is a perfect summation of who she is, or at least whom she thinks she is, in
the desert of Jakku. When we first meet her, the audience sees that she is a
skilled scavenger, an intelligent individual, someone who is caring and compassionate,
and last but not least, an ace pilot, in other words, Rey is amazing. But she
is stuck on a remote backwater so un-advanced that they seemingly do not have a
rudimentary capitalist economy. But why is Rey there? As Finn points out, as a
pilot Rey could go anywhere, but instead she stays. She stays because her
parents, because she is trapped in the past, yearning for a childhood she will
never have.
Rey
doesn’t have character “flaws” in a traditional meaning of the term, she’s a fundamentally
good person, and does good things. This is where the idea of her as a “Mary Sue”
starts to creep into view. But such a critique misses the point entirely. Her
whole arc of the film is accepting that she can be awesome, do amazing things,
and not just be a scavenger on Jakku, to let go of her parents. If she has any
flaw at all it’s a lack of confidence in her, confidence she gains throughout
the film.
Star
Wars is heavily influenced by American mythologist Joseph Campbell’s ideas of “The
Hero’s Journey”, or the idea of a regular person going on a quest to achieve
greatness. (This is a very abridged definition.) Part of the Hero’s Journey is
what’s known as “The Rejection of the Call”, where are would-be hero hears a
call to adventure, but declines it for various reasons and circumstances. In
Episode IV Luke is called to adventure by Obi-Wan, but decides to stay to help
out his aunt and uncle. Only the intervention of an outside force, the detachment
of stormtroopers, allows him to continue the quest. In Rey’s case she rejects
the call twice, one when she refuses
to be a part of Han’s crew on the Falcon, and second, when she rejects Maz’s
offer of Luke’s Lightsaber (also doubling as a rejection of the “Supernatural Aid” item that is on Campbell’s
list.) Like Luke, it is only through the intervention of an outside force (her
capture by Kylo Ren) that allows her to move forward.
In
fact, I would argue that the film does a better job of this then episode IV.
When Rey finally accepts the call (literally calling Luke’s saber to her hand;
doubling as accepting supernatural aid) she does so in defense of Finn, a
person who she’s built a bond with over the entire film, rather then members of
an actual family that, once they die, are never mentioned again. This even does
a good job of restating our theme, Rey can’t listen to Maz’s invocations of the
lightsaber legacy, its connection to the past, instead she uses it to defend
something new.
Speaking
of the force, let’s talk about Rey’s abilities, is she overpowered, and
therefore open to charges of Mary Sueism? The short answer is no, the long
answer, which I assume you want if you’ve read this far, is an emphatic no.
Besides Rey’s basic skills, which are all
things she could have plausibly learned on Jakku, Rey is obviously very able in
using the force. She can fly’s the Falcon with near perfection (despite having
never flown it before) uses a blaster extremely well, fights off (and turns the
table on) a trained and powerful darksider who is trying to invade her head,
uses a mind trick (an ability that mast likely she had no idea about) calls a lightsaber
to her hand, (overpowering said darksider) and engaging in a duel where she
puts up a credible threat (before tapping more fully into the force and curb-stomping
him).
Some of those things are more easily
explained, her saber abilities are foreshadowed when she fights with her staff
near the beginning of the film, Kylo Ren was obviously hurt, suffering the loss
of his father and it is unclear if he actually wanted to kill her, she obviously
previously knew the basic layout of the Falcon. Others are more mysterious, but
can easily be explained. In Episode IV Obi-Wan says that we can guide the force,
but the force can also guide us. Rey is a conduit; the force is allowing her
tap into things she has only a partial understanding of.
It’s also an interesting contrast with
Ren, Rey clearly has no idea how she’s doing things at times (Ridley really
sells the mix of joy, wonder, and bafflement). Ren always knows what he’s
doing, (even if he’s not totally in emotional control) always conscious of whom
he is, as son of Han and grandson of Anakin, always suppressing the bit of
light still left in him. Rey, contra, is almost a tabula rasa, unchained by her
past; the force flows more cleanly through her.
Also, when compared to Luke, are Rey’s abilities
actually even more impressive? In Episode IV he’s somehow best pilot in the
outer rim, and blows up the death star despite never flying an X-Wing before.
In Episode V he gives a good accounting of himself in a lightsaber duel,
despite having no one to practice with. And in Episode VI he force chokes
someone, mind tricks another, and manages to construct a new lightsaber on his
own. No, saying Rey is a Mary Sue when Luke is not, is the worst kind of sexist
special pleading.
Summing up. Despite certain recycled plot
points; this new Star Wars film distinguishes itself from its predecessors with
its contrasting theme, which serves as a great critique of the Skywallker dynasticism
that came before. I know that the two major theories of Rey’s parentage are
that of either Luke or Leia, but I hope that it turns out to be neither,
because as it stands The Force Awakens
stands as a powerful testimony for embracing your future, and not living in the
past.
Great article! my biggest issue with the film was that I would have liked Kylo's helmet to have been kept on for longer. Once that helmet came off, and Rey, SO new to the Force is able to look inside HIS head w/ the Force, well that whole plot just lost some steam. I would have preferred for his helmet to come off only once on the bridge w/ Han. Also, Rey simply being able resist the Force would have been enough, being so new as aI said and being able to quickly turn it on Kylo was a bit much. Also, I'm not sold on Finn NOT having any Force in him, but not sure how a former Storm Trooper in charge of Sanitation gets the skillz to handle a light saber well enough to hang w/ Ren in that fight. Seems like Ren/Kylo should have been able to dismantle Fin with the wave of a hand....
ReplyDelete